spinning a pole that is in orbit outside of the event horizon of a
black hole. one end of the pole is inside of the time flux caused by
the extreme warping of space time around a black hole. i came to the
conclusion that it would be harder to start the pole in motion due to
the elevated resting inertia of the "slower" side (slower meaning the
side in the time warp) but because it is still in open space once
started it will continue to follow it's momentum. now lets say you put
a battery powered motor on the "fast" side and a turbine on the "slow"
side the turbine is hooked to batteries as well. so for ease of
thinking lets say that the slow side is slowed by a factor of -1/3
speed, or effectively inside one second will pass compared to 3
outside. so if the motor outside is turning at 1 rotation a second.
then inside it is making 3 rotations a second. which causes a flaw
because that is effectively a free energy generator. you just harvest
the charged batteries. factoring in the lost energy through friction
and that with a generation ratio of three to one, it is not illogical
to assume you could get 2 charged batteries for the price of one. the
obvious simplicity of it is for theoretical use only also, i have
played with many variations of the concept. in truth you could make
this creation as large as nessesarry and place it in deeper time
destortion for more creation. so is my thinking flawed. i understand it
is presumptuous to say i made a free energy creator. my point is
theoretical flaw it is accepted that free energy is impossible. but i
have just shown by using modern accepted physical theory that it is
which means the theory is wrong. either 1. neither gravity nor speed,
can alter the passing of time, or energy can be created and as such
destroyed. i have one request if you reply don't just tell me you think
i am wrong. tell me why.